Well, Ed Morrissey over at Hot Air has a great piece up as to why Ahmadinejad (The President of Iran) is a scary and unstable individual. Why? Well, to put it in a few short words I guess it’s because he’s a “end-times fanatic that wishes to hasten the end of the world”.

Need proof? Ok:

The tensions surround Imam Mahdi, the 12th imam in a direct bloodline from the Prophet Muhammad, who the Shiite faithful believe will one day emerge from 1,000 years in hiding to save mankind and bring justice to the world. Tens of thousands of pilgrims go each year to the Jamkaran mosque near Qum, about 75 miles south of Tehran, where they believe that the imam will appear.

President Ahmadinejad, who came to office in 2005 declaring his intention to “hasten the emergence” of Imam Mahdi, said in a speech broadcast nationally this month that Imam Mahdi supported the day-to-day workings of his government and was helping him in the face of international pressure.

The real story? Well, most Muslims (not all) hold the belief that Muhammad al-Mahdi was the 12th Imam and that he disappeared on the day of his fathers (11th Imam) funeral during the funeral prayer. They believe that when the 12th Imam arises that he will rid the world of anything that is not Islam and establish a 100% muslim world.

What does that mean for all of us that are non-muslims? Well, the word “destruction” comes to mind and so does “world’s end”.

Ahmadinejad wants to hasten the return of the 12th Imam so that he can hurry up and create a fully muslim world and destroy the enemies of Islam. The crazy part? He actually believe that he can do it. Yet, Barack Obama wants to sit down and have “unconditional talks” with the President of Iran as if he could somehow change this madman’s mind?

Also equally insane.

How, and I really wish he would tell us all HOW, is Barack Obama going to persuade someone like Ahmadinejad (who wishes to destroy the non-muslim world in holy fire and bring about the end-times) that he needs to “stop acting all crazy”. That’s like telling a Schizophrenic to stop hearing voices without trying to prescribe any medication or trying to find them some type of procedure to try and correct the problem.

So, now that we’ve established that Ahmadinejad is pretty much crazy, why is it so necessary to have “talks” with the man? Obviously he is completely driven by religious zealotry and has even rejected the comments made by the Mullah’s of Iran…and those guys are supposed to practically run the place instead of the President.

What makes Barack think that his words can make any difference? Personally, I believe that nothing outside of the realm of “Peace through superior firepower” will suffice when dealing with iran, but apparently the MSM and their Messiah have other plans.

Probably plans that will endanger every single one of us down the road.

Advertisements

They must not have any type of free speech laws over there or something.

While Bridget Bardot might be asking for trouble for saying some derogatory remarks I just don’t see how a government can put someone on trial and sentence them to prison for making these remarks.

Prosecutors asked that the Paris court hand the 73-year-old former sex symbol a two-month suspended prison sentence and fine her 15,000 euros ($23,760) for saying the Muslim community was “destroying our country and imposing its acts”.

Since retiring from the film industry in the 1970s, Bardot has become a prominent animal rights activist but she has also courted controversy by denouncing Muslim traditions and immigration from predominantly Muslim countries.

She has been fined four times for inciting racial hatred since 1997, at first 1,500 euros and most recently 5,000.

Ummmm, does anyone think that perhaps the riots in Paris might have had anything to do with that? Or does anyone not remember this?

Remember people. Burning cars and rioting for weeks on end is staple in the religion of peace.

‘m not familiar with laws in France so I don’t know why they felt it was necessary to put a woman on trial for just speaking her mind. Disagree with her, fine, but imprison her? WTF France?