Well, Ed Morrissey over at Hot Air has a great piece up as to why Ahmadinejad (The President of Iran) is a scary and unstable individual. Why? Well, to put it in a few short words I guess it’s because he’s a “end-times fanatic that wishes to hasten the end of the world”.

Need proof? Ok:

The tensions surround Imam Mahdi, the 12th imam in a direct bloodline from the Prophet Muhammad, who the Shiite faithful believe will one day emerge from 1,000 years in hiding to save mankind and bring justice to the world. Tens of thousands of pilgrims go each year to the Jamkaran mosque near Qum, about 75 miles south of Tehran, where they believe that the imam will appear.

President Ahmadinejad, who came to office in 2005 declaring his intention to “hasten the emergence” of Imam Mahdi, said in a speech broadcast nationally this month that Imam Mahdi supported the day-to-day workings of his government and was helping him in the face of international pressure.

The real story? Well, most Muslims (not all) hold the belief that Muhammad al-Mahdi was the 12th Imam and that he disappeared on the day of his fathers (11th Imam) funeral during the funeral prayer. They believe that when the 12th Imam arises that he will rid the world of anything that is not Islam and establish a 100% muslim world.

What does that mean for all of us that are non-muslims? Well, the word “destruction” comes to mind and so does “world’s end”.

Ahmadinejad wants to hasten the return of the 12th Imam so that he can hurry up and create a fully muslim world and destroy the enemies of Islam. The crazy part? He actually believe that he can do it. Yet, Barack Obama wants to sit down and have “unconditional talks” with the President of Iran as if he could somehow change this madman’s mind?

Also equally insane.

How, and I really wish he would tell us all HOW, is Barack Obama going to persuade someone like Ahmadinejad (who wishes to destroy the non-muslim world in holy fire and bring about the end-times) that he needs to “stop acting all crazy”. That’s like telling a Schizophrenic to stop hearing voices without trying to prescribe any medication or trying to find them some type of procedure to try and correct the problem.

So, now that we’ve established that Ahmadinejad is pretty much crazy, why is it so necessary to have “talks” with the man? Obviously he is completely driven by religious zealotry and has even rejected the comments made by the Mullah’s of Iran…and those guys are supposed to practically run the place instead of the President.

What makes Barack think that his words can make any difference? Personally, I believe that nothing outside of the realm of “Peace through superior firepower” will suffice when dealing with iran, but apparently the MSM and their Messiah have other plans.

Probably plans that will endanger every single one of us down the road.

Advertisements

Words cannot describe the disgusting practices of this effed up chick.

Beginning next Tuesday, Shvarts (pictured) will be displaying her senior art project, a documentation of a nine-month process during which she artificially inseminated herself “as often as possible” while periodically taking abortifacient drugs to induce miscarriages. Her exhibition will feature video recordings of these forced miscarriages as well as preserved collections of the blood from the process.

What the heck is wrong with people? Even if you take the whole “abortion vs. pro-life” argument away from this (and I can bet you that it will come up at some point somewhere) is this not the most disturbing and vile practice that you’ve ever heard of?

The articles do not mention how old the fetus’ were at the time she had the miscarriages so there will obviously be some wiggling room to argue whether or not she was “killing a baby” or “removing a mass”.

Still, gross and disgusting. I will go as far as to say that it is psychotic and evil, but I’m sure someone out there will disagree with me.

———————————————————————————–

UPDATE: Allahpundit over at HotAir claims that people are calling this a hoax, but the word is still out on that one. I’ll go on to say this: IF the chick is lying and this is all some sort of hoax? Ok, fine, it’s all a hoax then. People are claiming that the “blood” used is probably just blood from her period. Still gross, but not a dead fetus.

However, IF the chick actually did artificially inseminate herself and repeatedly had abortive drugs in her to deliberately cause miscarriages? Yeah, thats truly TRULY screwed up right there.

Counterpoint by Busterman Zero

Let me break it down.

Using blood for artwork? Creepy in my eyes, may be the sign of a masocist.

Using pregnancy-blood/period-blood for artwork? Pretty gross but at least you’re doing something useful with it.

Using blood that was pumped into a fetus for artwork? Welcome to sicko territory.

Aborting a fetus and using the blood inside of it for artwork? The whitecoats are on their way. I don’t consider it evil, mind you, just insane because you’re suffering way too much for your art. For this to be evil she’d have to have some kind of malicious intent behind it, which I doubt she does.

I still hope this is a hoax.

UPDATE 2 [Aurvant] – Apparently Yale was calling this all out as a hoax. However, the crazy psycho could-be fetus destroyer “artist” claims that Yale is trying to cover it and that she REALLY did it.

But Shvarts stood by her project, calling the University’s statement “ultimately inaccurate.”

How inaccurate?

But Shvarts reiterated Thursday that she repeatedly use a needleless syringe to insert semen into herself. At the end of her menstrual cycle, she took abortifacient herbs to induce bleeding, she said. She said she does not know whether or not she was ever pregnant.

“No one can say with 100-percent certainty that anything in the piece did or did not happen,” Shvarts said, “because the nature of the piece is that it did not consist of certainties.”

Ahhh, so in all reality it seems that even if it were true it sounds as if she was trying to get pregnant and then immediately abort the embryo before it could mature. Or something like that.

Still, if this is true then this brings up serious mental health questions about Ms. Shvarts. I call in to question the mental state of anyone who would 1) perform such an act and 2) someone who would even go as far as faking it. It’s one thing to be controversial but it’s another to be just bat guano crazy.

Still, no real definite word on if it’s fake or real or whatever. Yale says its fake, Shvarts says its real.

More news to come, I’m sure.